Thursday, December 29, 2005

George Barna and Rousseau

George Barna is touting a new book called Revolution. Kevin Miller's recent review in Christianity Today provides a brief summary and an excellent critique. The revolution Barna write about involves a trend Barna has observed in his work: young believers walking away from the church to pursue more intimate and personally satisfying experiences of God. Barna is apparently passionate about the Church in the universal sense, but has come to see the local body as superfluous.

The article noted that Barna used to be something of an apologist for the megachurch and mass-marketed consumer Christianity. The writer notes the apparent irony in Barna's new stance that questions the validity or necessity of the local church and even champions a church-less Christian life as a step forward. Perhaps he has carried the pragmatic, consumer orientation to its logical conclusion - individualized spirituality that resembles the "Have it your way" mentality that pervades our culture. I suppose that can happen when you pay more attention to surveys than to biblical theology. (Did I say that out loud?)

If you will pardon me a brief philosophical excursis, it is almost as if Barna is advocating a spiritual version of Rousseau's myth of the Noble Savage. For Rousseau, of course, the myth (now strong in the popular mind) was that the "natural man," unfettered by the shackles of civiliation and technology, lived in a state of natural purity and goodness. Civilization, however, brings with it bondage, degradation, self-interest, and all sorts of other vices. (Many who disparage the work of missionaries in primitive cultures buy into this idea.) Barna seems to have a similarly romantic image of the "Noble Christian Savage," unfettered by the trappings of dry institutionalism, empty tradition, and other vices that often beset American evangelicalism. Of course it is ironic in that many of Barna's books aimed to help churches market themselves to the consumer culture.

I share the concern that the Church and evangelicalism in general has become too institutionalized. But the answer is not to walk away from churches. The challenge, rather, is to recover a biblical vision for the church and the centrality of Christian community in the believer's life. Our culture may seek spirituality without religion or, more likely without responsibility. Many Christians apparently seek the same, and George Barna wants to give it to them. But that's not real Christianity. Real Christianity is not an individual affair, but participation in a community, a family, a kingdom. It is, as Dietrich Bonhoeffer writes so powerfully, a "life together."

(Matt Hall has some nice thoughts on the subject. )

6 comments:

Tony K. said...

Good point about Rousseau. Only one problem - I've read some of Barna's work and what you wrote may be over his head. His book on children's ministry read like the first draft of a high school newspaper.

Chris said...

I like your point regarding Barna. When I first started reading the Emerging church material I found a lot that I really appreciated. But as time has gone on I have also felt a renewed hope for the local congregation.

l. said...

nice blog dude!

zane anderson said...

Hello, KY, this is TN,

Barna's "Revolution" will be discussed this Friday night (2-3-06) on the nationwide Moody Broadcasting Network. "Open Line" is a call-in show which is aired at 8-8:55 pm CT. The phone number is 312-329-4460.

For station and time of broadcast information see http://openlineradio.org.

The programs are archived for download if you're unable to tune in.

Anonymous said...

Rousseau's myth is just that, a myth so how could you use it against Barna when it doesn't actually exist materially speaking or even spiritually for that matter (unless that is you are saying that Barna's vision doesn't exist). Barna is speaking of real things that are really happening experientially speaking. We all know man is not a myth and civilization doesn't exist. So why give more credit to Rousseau than to Barna. Your blog only gives negations and provides no solutions. Barna sounds extremely pro-emerging church (body of Christ as opposed to building of people) in a severely decaying western culture. Your blog would have been much more convincing if you used the reality of Hobbes' Leviathian, the increasingly revealed nature of man's true state, sinfulness, becoming ever so more apparent over time in this culture which overwhelmingly disapproves of life and approves of death. Civilization is just a dictionary word and nothing more. It is a learned state not an innate one.

Alex F said...

I welcome anonymous comments because not everyone is registered with Blogger. But please sign your name. Of course, most anonymous posters don't come back.

Having dispensed with that.... I'm not sure how to respond to your verbose comments. Rousseau's Noble Savage is indeed a myth, but the point is that he portrayed it as a reality. He believed it, and the idea is presupposed by many in the present.

While I doubt that Barna is consciously adopting the idea, I've sought to show a parallel that I think is interesting. I think Rousseau was wrong. While I have no doubts that Barna is accurately reporting a current trend, I think the trend is dangerous and opposed to Scripture.

I'm not sure what you mean when I say I'm giving Rousseau more credit than Barna. I'm also not sure what you want solutions for....